1 of 1- Olivia27
- New Member
Offline - Registered: 26-5-2016
- Posts: 2
Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Hi all,
Does anyone know whether it is possible to find a replacement and how easy this is to fix?
Hannah
- Olivia27
- New Member
Offline
- Registered: 26-5-2016
- Posts: 2
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
- •
Thread Starter- thetypewriterman
- Key Master
Offline
- From: Leiston, England
- Registered: 29-5-2013
- Posts: 892
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
When you say the striker, do you mean the hammer at the back or the rubber strip that acts as a platen on these machines ?
- colrehogan
- Key Master
Offline
- From: Granite City, IL
- Registered: 05-2-2015
- Posts: 609
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Nice looking machine!
Smith Premier typewriters are cool!
- Markmotown
- Touch Typist
Offline
- From: Villanova, PA
- Registered: 16-12-2015
- Posts: 183
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Jumping in on an old thread:
But I'm having the same problem: the rubberized strip on the back of my Hammond finally disintegrated completely, and I'm not sure where to turn. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
- M. Höhne
- Key Master
Offline
- From: Maine
- Registered: 14-3-2013
- Posts: 623
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Markmotown wrote:
Jumping in on an old thread:
But I'm having the same problem: the rubberized strip on the back of my Hammond finally disintegrated completely, and I'm not sure where to turn. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
See this guy:
- Markmotown
- Touch Typist
Offline
- From: Villanova, PA
- Registered: 16-12-2015
- Posts: 183
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Yes, I saw that. And I may have to go that route. I don't know who that guy is, but he seems to be emphatic both there on eBay and elsewhere "NOT TO TYPE WITHOUT IT IN PLACE!!!" Okay, it is there for a reason--it seems to make the printed impression better--but I used the Hammond a bit today even after the strip broke with a few sheets of backing paper, and it seemed to work okay.
I just hope I'm not damaging the shuttle by "exposing" it to the hammer... if that's indeed what I'm even doing at all.
- mre12ax7
- Touch Typist
Offline
- Registered: 28-3-2015
- Posts: 192
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Yes, I saw that. And I may have to go that route. I don't know who that guy is, but he seems to be emphatic both there on eBay and elsewhere "NOT TO TYPE WITHOUT IT IN PLACE!!!" Okay, it is there for a reason--it seems to make the printed impression better--but I used the Hammond a bit today even after the strip broke with a few sheets of backing paper, and it seemed to work okay.
I just hope I'm not damaging the shuttle by "exposing" it to the hammer... if that's indeed what I'm even doing at all.
Typing without the impression strip is a bad idea. The impression strip keeps the hammer from damaging the type.
My blog - Just Typewriters
- Markmotown
- Touch Typist
Offline
- From: Villanova, PA
- Registered: 16-12-2015
- Posts: 183
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Ok. Thank you.
**grumbles off to pay money**
- M. Höhne
- Key Master
Offline
- From: Maine
- Registered: 14-3-2013
- Posts: 623
Re: Hammond 1916 Multiplex Striker Missing
Ok. Thank you.
**grumbles off to pay money**
You should be happy that somebody did the work to make this such an easy fix for you. I wish somebody would cast me a new frame for my bent Olympia SF.
