You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



07-4-2016 21:42:50  #21


Re: If you could pick one...

I wasn't sure, ztyper, if what you meant actual values or values then translated to now.  If that were the case, then something that cost a few hundred then would cost a couple of thousand and then some in today's money. 


Underwood--Speeds the World's Bidness
 

10-4-2016 20:47:21  #22


Re: If you could pick one...

Hey again,

I appreciate the debate and wealth of information thus far. I ended up going with a Royal KHM. Yes, the feel of a standard, this one at least, compared to a portable is obvious. I'm in the middle of Camp NaNoWriMo and may just have to switch over to it from my 50s Royal QDL.

The only issue I have with the machine is the Tabulator key. It takes a few hits for it to finally move to the next depressed tab stop. I might have to get it looked at. Oh, and the 'U' key's glass is cracked. Are the glass tops (the glass itself) replaceable?

Thanks again for all of the feedback. There's a picture of this machine and most of my collection over in the New Member thread.

 

     Thread Starter
 

29-4-2016 18:58:53  #23


Re: If you could pick one...

Uwe wrote:

The key to the question is the criteria that you can only have one standard. So, are you a serious typist? Or someone who just punches a few keys on occasion? If you're a poser, then any standard you like the look of will do; they all type well enough to satisfy someone who only dabbles in typing. However, if you need a real workhorse, one machine that does it all, is feature laden and performs exceptionally well, then you have to be far more discriminating.

I own all of the models that have been mentioned so far in this thread, and I would choose the Olympia SG1. It's the complete package, period. I can't think of another standard that can match it for features (paper injector, quick carriage release, double character spacing, a FIVE position vibrator, paper rest, touch control, a jammed key release, spring-loaded keys, etc.). Of all the standards that I own it's my go-to machine for getting work done. And there's a reason that there's an SG Owners' Club here, and why it's so popular.
 

I have a question:  Just what is considered a serious typist?  I mean, how many pages must one type to mean business when using a typewriter?  In a recent thread, I answered that I type roughly 8 pages a week.  In the 35 to 38 years I've been operating typewriters of various kinds, I should only hope that I am not a poser.
 


Underwood--Speeds the World's Bidness
 

01-5-2016 18:15:35  #24


Re: If you could pick one...

TypewriterKing wrote:

Uwe wrote:

The key to the question is the criteria that you can only have one standard. So, are you a serious typist? Or someone who just punches a few keys on occasion? If you're a poser, then any standard you like the look of will do; they all type well enough to satisfy someone who only dabbles in typing. However, if you need a real workhorse, one machine that does it all, is feature laden and performs exceptionally well, then you have to be far more discriminating.

I own all of the models that have been mentioned so far in this thread, and I would choose the Olympia SG1. It's the complete package, period. I can't think of another standard that can match it for features (paper injector, quick carriage release, double character spacing, a FIVE position vibrator, paper rest, touch control, a jammed key release, spring-loaded keys, etc.). Of all the standards that I own it's my go-to machine for getting work done. And there's a reason that there's an SG Owners' Club here, and why it's so popular.
 

I have a question:  Just what is considered a serious typist?  I mean, how many pages must one type to mean business when using a typewriter?  In a recent thread, I answered that I type roughly 8 pages a week.  In the 35 to 38 years I've been operating typewriters of various kinds, I should only hope that I am not a poser.
 

I just discovered I asked that question twice.  Pardon me for the repeat, but sometimes when reading these threads, they get pretty long and I tend to forget some of what was written.  I'll try to do better next time.
 


Underwood--Speeds the World's Bidness
 

02-5-2016 09:15:28  #25


Re: If you could pick one...

I've never used a standard, really, besides the SGs... The SG3 is my real love, being ineffably beautiful as well as useful, and Tyewriterman I am going to send you that feed roller back!! (I also love it because I collected it the day after my uncle died, and brought it back from the dead.) In the meantime, thanks to Spazmelda, I can use the SG1, with two backing pages and a sheet of mylar. I really need to keep on with the rubber rejuvenator...

TypewriterKing, I think a lot of people on here take part in NaNoWriMo so they need to type for hours a day all through November, at the very least. I keep thinking I'll do it but have never managed to get enough prep done in time - but last year, before everything blew up with actual deadlines, I was all set to try it on a combo of a Hermes 3000 and an SM9. And the line lever is now broken on the Hermes, so that's just a new headache.

i think in an average week I might type about 20pp, but it depends what I'm doing/working on... if I'm drafting something I'll do 10pp in a morning.

 

02-5-2016 22:21:35  #26


Re: If you could pick one...

I like my Royal KMM, but am looking into a more "modern" (i.e., only 50 years old instead of 70 or 80!) standard.  Anyone ever try either a Hermes 8 or 9 or Ambassador,  Facit T2, or Olympia SG2 or SG3? 

 

02-5-2016 23:28:58  #27


Re: If you could pick one...

OK.

1) I lack standing to have an opinion, but
2) When did that stop anybody, and
3) I did type several tens of thousands of words on one machine recently, and
4) that machine was the IBM B...

I know. I just said I ditched the B because of irreconcilable mechanical differences and I am vacillating here more than an Old China Hand in a Shanghai Cat House, but I made an appreciation and decided to type without the carriage cover! Woohoo. I can't understand the mechanical connection so it must be that the machine was getting warm with work and wanted to strip to the waist. I don't need the type scales and I don't need the paper table and I don't need the furshlugginer paper guide because I'm just brainstorming and I can line up the margin by eye. Type the way you want to friend.

I know it's an orange and some do not like them but I only have to please myself, and whatever it is, it is certainly not a computer. It's something yet different and it gives the pleasant impression to the error indifferent user that he can type like a howling banshee. If I got to choose two I would chose this machine and an SG-1 and for most purposes use the Behemoth. If I were forced to choose one I would take the SG-1 on the min regrets principle: I would regret less giving up the cranky electro-mechanical beast and keeping the classic manual than the other way around, even though if I had both I would mostly go to the other. Classic madonna/non-madonna thinking.

That's my choice and I'm sticking with it for the next twenty minutes. Don't try to talk me out of it. Before then.


"Damn the torpedoes! Four bells, Captain Drayton".
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum