Offline
Kalani wrote:
Ixzed23 wrote:
Never mind folks!
I took the belts out of my 1964 SCM Electra 120, made in Canada (it might be different than thebones made in the USA).
The front belt is actually 311 mm long but I would settle for 310 mm while the rear one (with the silver mark) is 320 mm long. Measured by walking the outside flat side on a measuring tape.
The rear belt has a pretty bad set that has not gotten better since October 2021, when I became its new owner.
DanielAloha Daniel,
In one of my earlier posts, I have a picture of using two 315 mm belts per the links and sources given me on this thread. I have tried them on a number of Electra 120's, also 250's. There are some variances between machines that small adjustments in motor positions and other adjustments can't cover. On some Electra 120's, two 315 mm belts were just too tight to get on. On others, they were mountable but too tight for good motor bearing life. And, in others, they fit just fine. This is where the greater "stretchy" tolerance of the various sizes of "O" ring type belts, also on this thread, come in handy. And, even with the "O" ring belts, sometimes a combination of 2 different sizes works better than identical size belts. The rear belt has to clear the body to carriage trim plate without being too tight, and yet with enough flex to allow the center pulley to slide up and down on its pivot arm. Same for the front belt to the drive bar.
If two 315 mm V belts work for you, I have the serial numbers and sources upthread, then great.
Have you tried the "O" rings yet instead of pursuing V belts?
k
Offline
The green PU round belting may not be the solution. There are a fair few mid-1980's Silver-Reed 2600 electric portables in the UK that are in good condition except for the drive belt which has stretched. The belt, of course, is totally unobtainable. In an attempt to solve this problem, I tried the PU belting. Unlike the SCM, the Silver-Reed has one long belt. It obviously relies on that belt being soft and grippy. The PU belt isn't grippy enough and tightening it / shortening it doesn't work. I did finally make my own machine work by constructing a spring-loaded jockey-pulley halfway through the bottom belt run. This had the effect of increasing the wrap area around the large front pulley, therefore increasing the area around the pulley that the belt is in contact with. It did seem to solve the problem, allowing the carriage return to work, although a bit slower than with the proper belt, and with the typebars operating correctly. I would never go to this trouble for a customers' machine, especially as I couldn't guarantee that it would keep working, but it was an interesting experiment !
Offline
thetypewriterman wrote:
The green PU round belting may not be the solution...
There are limitations, for sure. One is the min diameter of the pulley. For 3 mm diam belt, the pulley should be 30 mm diam or bigger, according to specs.
Ideally, the belt should be pliable but not stretchy. V-belts are still best.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
Offline
OregonJim wrote:
PU belts sound interesting. Do they seem to be "grippy" enough? It would be convenient to make your own belts of any size from that stuff...
Those PU or TPU round belts are grippy, yet not sticky, because of their texture. I use them for my watchmaker's lathes with success. That being said, the small size of the pulleys in SCM electric typewriters might be an issue. The 3 mm round belt is spec'd for min 30 mm pulleys.
Offline
M. Höhne wrote:
Ixzed23 wrote:
Thanks Jim.
Two belts of 315 mm would work. I assume it would cause the typebar to hit the platen faster than if the rear belt was 320 mm long.... snip ...
DanielWhy would you assume that??
Because a shorter belt will affect the variable diameter center pulley by increasing its rotational speed.
Offline
Hi Kalani,
Thanks. Yes, I read the complete conversation of this post from page 1.
I am really puzzled that the same belt size is not used on all the variations of SCM series 6 and 7 electrics. Hence my initial question.
Offline
Ixzed23 wrote:
Hi Kalani,
Thanks. Yes, I read the complete conversation of this post from page 1.
I am really puzzled that the same belt size is not used on all the variations of SCM series 6 and 7 electrics. Hence my initial question.
You're right. I don't know why the actual applications are different.
From the early SCM Electra 120's platforms with manual carriage returns to the power carriage returns that include the Coronet Electric 10's, Super 12's, 220's, 250's (Secretarials), and various models with different casings and names but same (innards), there are variances in the assembly and maybe materials tolerances such that, for example, the same 315 mm belts are just too tight to either install at all or too tight on the motor and clutch.
I've ordered the next size up to try out varying the belt sizing, or using that one size larger on both belts.
I'm also trying various sizes of the "cog belts" which are 2-4's and 3-4's on the cogged belt SCM later model electrics with either ribbon spools or the ribbon cartridges. It costs from 4-9 dollars per belt plus 7-10 dollars shipping. I count the cogs and micrometer measure everything on the belts, but still, it's a slow process. There's not much info about sources of these belts so I hope it will benefit others in the long run.
Also, the later SCM's with single cog belt power/motor drives have tapered wheel belt tensioners or guides on some models and not on others. I have to see how this effects the belt lengths as well.
So far, the main drive single long cog belts are available, but not the 3mm ? cartridge drive side belt. If others here know other belt maker/distributors to search for those sizes, please let me know. (thanks!).
Anyway, I hope this is helpful. Others here are the "typewriter gurus" and "experts", not me. We're getting good help here.
k
Offline
I should write a book....
" Recollections Of An O-Ring Collector's Collection "
.
Offline
Yes!
I'm sure in the recesses of some antique store somewhere, you could find an o-ring travelling salesman's display case for these. That'd make the perfect home for these.
Offline
So on my new-to-me S-C 250...I tried a pair of the 3M315 Gates poly-flex belts with their external cogs.
Fit was fine, but it made some odd noise as though the cogs were rubbing along the sides of the pulley grooves.
Kept them on for 2-3 hours with the machine running but the noise did not go away.
Went back to o-rings which are very quiet on this machine.
When I get a chance, I will try the cogged Gates belts on my S-C Electria 120 to see if I can use them there. Will report results, then.
.
.