Offline
This might be of interest only to me, but I have been wanting to take this pic for some time: side-by-side 1970 and 1977 SM9s. Both completely unremarkable machines, pica etc, but I feel like you can really see the progression of the industry here as Olympia worked to stay profitable under pressure.
Online!
The other major change with these later SM9's is the loss of the Tab set & clear key-tops on both sides of the space bar. Tab set/clear functions moved to the metal lever on the left side and those previous touch-controls moved back to under the body cowling as they were with the early SM7's.
Offline
Interesting comparison. Thanks for posting. I have a 1971 SM9 (and a 1956 SM3). I have read several comments that the SM9 was boring or unremarkable. If I could only keep one of my 12 typewriters, it would be the SM9. Great type quality, lack of drama, reliability, modern lines, quality build.
Offline
Penhurion wrote:
I have read several comments that the SM9 was boring or unremarkable.
I think operas are boring and unremarkable. That says more about me than it does operas.
I like the SM9, even though the touch is...not my style. It has a clean look. I would trust it to hold up under heavy use.
Offline
Thank you for posting that. What can you say about the typing experience? Are there major differences in touch and response?
Offline
I absolutely agree with Penhurion, especially the part about the “lack of drama”. I typed a number of single spaced pages on my SM9 today, and I knew it would get the job done with no surprises. I have four other machines, each is fun in its own quirky way, but when I have to get serious, the SM9 is my go to.
Online!
For long days or several days of just high-volume, final-draft typing, I reach for either one of these two in my collection.
So much easier on my 68 year old hands.
1974 Olympia SGE-35 electric
Or...
1971 Hermes 10 electric
.