mikeytap wrote:
I used the luger reference some months ago, because it's a common discussion among WWII history buffs that the Luger was a precision instrument built to close tolerances, but that also resulting in it being more prone to jamming. If you're keeping track of gun references please don't assume any love on my part for guns in general.
Oh, I'm with you, mikeytap. I even thought it was an apt comparison. It's just that it struck me as a reference that wouldn't resonate with many people; there was an earlier comparison claiming an Olivetti was smooth like a Ferrari and I'm thinkin', "Jeez, I never even heard a Ferrari much less even sat in one or drove one, so what does this tell me about an Olivetti?"
No, I'm not keeping track. I do read TT, a lot and it just struck me that so many people said they couldn't relate to the sound of a .22 handgun (why not a long gun? because of the earlier pistols?) and one commenter even added ".22 LR" which the OP didn't mention. (For those missing that reference, the LR means "long rifle", the larger, hence louder, .22 cartridge.) So, although not keeping track, the mention stood out.
Truly assumed nothing about your enthusiasms. From my comments, you might have thought I know something about guns and you'd be right. The main reason I don't have any is that I can't afford yet another hobby. Typewriters is a rich and satisfying enough field. I'm glad to meet folks like you through it.