Ouch! Gosh, Pete, I am not attacking you. I was merely giving some historical info. I thought and intended that, anyway. (And a careful reading of my response will show that I was responding to zpark's inference from what you wrote, not to your statement. I only included your snippet to give context to zpark's.)
You say Tolex can be used as a modern-day alternative; I said, "... it is a good cover for our cases." [Emphasis in the original.] I still think that I am agreeing with you. Then I take the opportunity to promote it and tell other readers where to get it. And then, prompted by your comment, I went on and linked to other modern aids to typewriter rejuvenation, for all the readers here.
I must say, I read all of your posts with fascination for your enthusiasm and care and energy in working with our mutual interest. I am concerned with the vehemence of your response to this one comment and wonder if there has been some tension building up over time. I'm sorry to have given offense, now or in the past.
Happy typing! Good thing you do not need me for that.