Maintenance & Repairs » Imperial Messenger platen removal / loose line spacing selector » 09-12-2024 09:16:26 |
Hah, as usual, I figure out the solution just minutes after sending the help request. For some reason I had not thought of checking under the carriage side panels; sure enough there is a hole there which allows access to the screws which hold the knobs in place. Well, that is one problem solved. Remains to be seen if I can actually fix the line space selector though.
Maintenance & Repairs » Imperial Messenger platen removal / loose line spacing selector » 09-12-2024 08:44:48 |
While I'm no longer buying typewriters for myself as I have all that I need, I had agreed to buy this 1960s Imperial Messenger T (tabulator version) months ago already, and I finally received it yesterday.
The original owner had obviously taken good care of the machine. It worked from the get go and there wasn't that much cleaning to be done. It came in a brown faux leather zipper case often seen on ultra-portables of the era; but I'm not sure if I would classify this as a big ultra-portable, or a small portable. Despite the plastic shell, it feels very robust and it's rather heavy as well. The plastic they used for the shell is thick and sturdy, so it's not gonna crack as easily as the plastic used in the third gen Hermes 3000, for example.
It also came with a servicing receipt from 1984, which states that the feed rollers had been cleaned, the operation had taken 30 minutes and the cost was 62,50 Finnish markkas. In today's money that would be about 26-27 €.
It's definitely a rather unique looking design; if the British WW2 era Valentine tank was a typewriter, I think it would look something like this. Not that much can be found about them online, other than what is written here: . I think there is just one video on Youtube featuring this typewriter, and that is just a short clip of someone typing with one.
My Messenger only had two actual problems: A loose shift lock, which was easy enough to fix; and after that there is the loose line space selector. It doesn't render the machine unusable, but at least when using the single line option, it sometimes gives you 1½ lines instead, and this is not acceptable if I actually want to use it for serious writing.
I cannot really tell why it
Portable Typewriters » Help in identifying Olympia typewriter model » 26-11-2024 15:15:26 |
Well, the mystery was solved: this machine indeed came out of the Optima factory with that Optima-colored Olympia decal, and without the Elite logo on the ribbon cover. I spotted a similar one for sale:
I have no idea what happened to that machine's margin release key though, as "DEVAM" is not Finnish, unlike the language of the other keys. According to wiktionary, it might be Turkish?
Side note: That Olympia sports the alternative Finnish keyboard layout, which was also known as the Remington keyboard, as it was introduced by Systema Oy, Remington's main Finnish distributor. It was designed to be uniquely fit for the needs of the Finnish language, and this layout competed with the standard layout (which was probably adopted from Sweden, and also known as the Underwood keyboard) for several decades, from the early 1900s until 1960, when the Finnish office machine association finally put an end to the bothersome system of having two competing keyboard layouts. This alternative "XASDF" layout, as some modern enthusiasts call it, must not have been bad at all if you were used to it, but these days it just renders a large amount of old Finnish typewriters unusable for anyone who is used to the standard layout, which is pretty much everyone
Portable Typewriters » Puzzling....Hermes 3000S Typewriter » 26-11-2024 14:48:05 |
I saw a video on Youtube with a similar machine, and that one was made in Poland instead of Sweden. From that we can make an educated guess that this is indeed a Facit Privat/1620, which was made to look like a 3rd gen Hermes 3000. I had one of those Facits, made in Sweden in the 1970s, and I quite liked it. The brown faux leather case was probably the best I've seen, with plenty of space to store your papers and stationery.
Standard Typewriters » The wonderful Underwood Touch-Master 5 » 26-11-2024 14:31:31 |
Beachycove wrote:
I like the Touch-Master 5 as well, largely because of the late 50s/early 60s look, which is Olivetti work, I gather.
I could be mistaken, but I remember reading that the design of the TM5, aesthetics included, is from Underwood themselves, and I can believe that as the earlier Touch-Master II looks pretty much identical. If correct, it's probably the last non-Olivetti design to come out of the Underwood factory. I quite like the look as well.
Beachycove wrote:
One caught my eye in an antiques mall a few years back, and I thought, wouldn’t a magnificent machine like that be handy for this and that? I had been wrestling with labels in the office and was sick and tired of fiddling with printers. Home — and thence to the office — came the TM5.
There was some very minor damage, so I also bought a parts machine that appeared in a local for sale ad, but I ended up fixing both during the COVID lockdown by making some small parts from metal, so that I now have two TM5s, one pica and one elite, one being wide carriage and the other not. BUT, I am missing the ribbon covers on one, which I can’t find anywhere. I fashioned some from copper sheeting, but they just don’t look right. Any chance you would sell me them from your parts unit?
I would love to help you with the ribbon covers, but as my parts machine is currently fully operational and therefore still sellable as such if my situation changes and I need to get rid of it, I am still hesitant to start removing and selling any parts from it. If I end up removing any essential parts, rendering it non-operational, I will be in touch.
Beachycove wrote:
As to the platen and knobs, I do believe that all those knobs should screw off the platens so that you can swap parts as required. See the repair manual available on the inter-webs.
…
And as to the carriage removal: It has been a while, but I seem to recall having taken off the spring from the carriage (and secured it on the screw conve
Standard Typewriters » The wonderful Underwood Touch-Master 5 » 08-11-2024 06:09:09 |
Thank you for the answers, gentlemen. I have been extremely busy lately, and will return to this topic a bit later, hopefully next week.
Standard Typewriters » The wonderful Underwood Touch-Master 5 » 29-10-2024 11:36:39 |
skywatcher wrote:
Hi JJH
It is said that there is no such thing as "The Perfect Typewriter", but there is usually the typewriter that's perfect for you and it looks like you've found it. That machine was built when I was 3 years old and looks like a piece of solid industrial machinery.
You indicate that the paper bail is a little too high for your liking, here's my thought. These machines were made for use in professional offices and typing pools, so the paper being used probably had printed letterheads which filled the top few centimetres of the paper. The printed top edge of the paper would comfortably tuck under the paper bail holding the main body of the letter ready for the typist, as I say, this is just a thought.
For continuation pages, I was taught to put the page number top and center on the page with a couple of line spaces below the page number. This might give you just enough head-space to tuck the page under the paper bail for the first line of typing, see if you think this idea would work for you. All the best,
Sky
Hi Sky,
My father was born about a year before this machine was manufactured. The original owner really did take good care of it.
Thank you for the tip about the page number and empty spaces. I had been doing this before, but for some reason I had typed the page number in the top corner; I'm not sure why it never occurred to me that I can just as well insert it at the top and center as well. With the Touch-Master the gap is still a bit too wide even if I do this, but as I said, it's not really a big issue.
thetypewriterman wrote:
Pleased to hear that you like your TM5. You might be interested to hear that the typewriter firm I was working for in the late 1970's bought a large quantity of these as surplus from the US Air Force. They are good machines, but we found them difficult to sell because the appearance of the Underwood 'outrigger' carriage made them look strange to customers used of Adlers, Olympias etc. As to ribb
…
Standard Typewriters » The wonderful Underwood Touch-Master 5 » 27-10-2024 17:21:32 |
Oh, the extras also included three metallic ribbon rings, as shown in the photo. I believe these were used in some models of Remington typewriters, like the All-New Portable and the Riter-series of machines, or did they fit on some Underwoods as well?
Standard Typewriters » The wonderful Underwood Touch-Master 5 » 27-10-2024 14:56:05 |
Hi all,
Besides work, family, writing, and learning how to fix up various typewriters, I spent a better part of last summer searching for the "perfect" standard-sized "daily typer". I went through a plethora of machines like the SG3, a couple of Imperials and a few different Continental Standards, which were all nice machines, but each had some issue or other which would not let me justify using it over my portables. I almost gave up on standards (I promised to sort out my typewriter situation before the end of 2024), until I finally found the machine which felt right in almost every aspect. As the name of the thread reveals, that machine is the Underwood Touch-Master 5, aka the Underwood Five or "the last Underwood".
I had been aware of the machine's existence ever since seeing this one in the window of a local thrift store, but it was in a somewhat rough shape and missing the spools, plus the asking price was too high anyway.
Then, a few weeks ago, I saw one for sale online for a fair price (these are not that common in here), and the notice mentioned a willingness to send it by mail. Judging from the photos it looked to be in perfect condition. I could see it still had a ribbon, so I figured the spools were there as well.
After some questions, I agreed to buy the machine. It arrived in a couple of days, well-packed and intact. It was in a beautiful condition indeed, except for two things: The platen was smooth and hard (this was not a surprise), and the keys were absolutely frozen in place.
It came with some extras: A couple of unopened calculator-size Pelikan cotton ribbons, an empty Crusader-brand ribbon container, the original dust cover plus a smaller one for some Underwood calculator, old bru
Portable Typewriters » Incoming: Scheidegger President » 03-6-2024 16:12:09 |
Thanks for the info. I would not had guessed that they gave a different model number just because of the different color schemes.
Picked it up today:
It needs a good cleaning as expected and the ribbon was completely dry, but everything seems to be in working order and none of the keys stick. Luckily the yellowish stains on the plastic shell and ribbon cover don't seem to be permanent discoloration.
While it's not heavy, and slightly lighter than my Tippa S, I'm not sure if it technically counts as an ultra-portable, as it's actually quite chunky in size and quite a bit longer and taller than the Tippa S. I assume that the Lettera 35 was about the same size but heavier. All in all yet another interesting machine. Will see how I like the touch after getting it cleaned up.