Offline
Greetings,
If you could pick only one standard typewriter, which would it be and why? I ask because I've collected a number of portables but they are easy to store away and rotate between. I'd like one standard machine to remain out and on my desk for regular use. I originally had my eye on a Royall KMM, then I noticed the Royal KHM but now I'm looking at an Underwood 5. The Underwood would look absolutely splendid, all fixed up and functioning, the mechanical operations from the side and just the classic antique look of the unit makes forgoing it in favor of a Royal a tough decision. Any thoughts or preferences?
Thank you!
Offline
Nothing against Alpina or Olympia SM-series owners, because I am sure these are first-class typewriters, but I still stand behind my 1952 Royal HH standard typewriter. It is a robust, almost indestructible machine with a still pretty good availability of spare parts. I also own two Olympia SG machines, which one day I will fix. But, if I were to pick just one, it would have to be the stalwart Royal HH.
Offline
Id have to choose an early Underwood. (Underwood #3 with a 26 inch carriage anyone? Useful for filling out ledgers!).
Like you said they look great and type great.
Offline
I'd have to say the SG1, with the SG3 as an alternate.
Offline
TypewriterGuy wrote:
Id have to choose an early Underwood. (Underwood #3 with a 26 inch carriage anyone? Useful for filling out ledgers!).
Heh, yeah Typewriterguy, I can't tell you how many happy hours I've spent typing my IRS tax forms this year! (Yes, that's humor folks. And no, I did NOT type my tax forms, this year or any year!)
Offline
If you're looking for a looker and an overall great machine, I'd do a Royal 10. They have that classic look with high gloss paint, and two (or four) side windows on the machine for looking inside.
I personally really like the touch, but you can also adjust the touch with a touch control, which many other machines at the time did not have easy access to. Even the early Royals have the great "snappy" action that many other collectors talk about. They're solid and sturdy, but lack the refinement and the features of later typewriters, such as a key-set tabulator and automatic margin sets.
Actually... now that I think about it, I might just choose the Royal 10 as my #1 pick!
Offline
ztyper wrote:
If you're looking for a looker and an overall great machine, I'd do a Royal 10. They have that classic look with high gloss paint, and two (or four) side windows on the machine for looking inside.
I personally really like the touch, but you can also adjust the touch with a touch control, which many other machines at the time did not have easy access to. Even the early Royals have the great "snappy" action that many other collectors talk about. They're solid and sturdy, but lack the refinement and the features of later typewriters, such as a key-set tabulator and automatic margin sets.
Actually... now that I think about it, I might just choose the Royal 10 as my #1 pick!
A very good choice!! I have a 1916 four-glass typewriter myself. Yes, mine has that "snappy touch" too. And, also, even the front plate above the keys is cast iron. Incidentally, do you have such a machine in your collection? If so, what year was it made, and is it a two-er or a four-er?
Offline
The key to the question is the criteria that you can only have one standard. So, are you a serious typist? Or someone who just punches a few keys on occasion? If you're a poser, then any standard you like the look of will do; they all type well enough to satisfy someone who only dabbles in typing. However, if you need a real workhorse, one machine that does it all, is feature laden and performs exceptionally well, then you have to be far more discriminating.
I own all of the models that have been mentioned so far in this thread, and I would choose the Olympia SG1. It's the complete package, period. I can't think of another standard that can match it for features (paper injector, quick carriage release, double character spacing, a FIVE position vibrator, paper rest, touch control, a jammed key release, spring-loaded keys, etc.). Of all the standards that I own it's my go-to machine for getting work done. And there's a reason that there's an SG Owners' Club here, and why it's so popular.
Offline
Since we're talking standards here, I would have to say either my Remington 17 or LC Smith no. 8. I used the Remington for what little of NaNoWriMo I did this year and it worked fine. The LC Smith has a decimal tabulator on it (fascinated by those since seeing it in the US Navy film).
Uwe, what would one need with a five position vibrator?
Offline
colrehogan wrote:
...what would one need with a five position vibrator?
Oops, sorry, I messed up... I should have written a FOUR position vibrator instead:
1. Stencil mode - Highly unlikely it would ever be needed, but for those who have a mimeograph the option is there.
2. Black - Use the top portion of the ribbon.
3. Red - Use the bottom portion of the ribbon.
4. Yellow - Use the middle portion of the ribbon to get every last bit of ink out of it.
Olympia's instructions for the penny-pinching black ribbon buyers out there: Use up the ribbon in the black position first, then switch the vibrator to the yellow position. When the ribbon is used up in the yellow position, flip the spools over and switch the vibrator back to the black position.