Offline
Manual- Requires no electricity
Electric- Requires electricity (mechanical)
Electronic- Requires electricity (digital)
Here we have three varieties of typewriter. What I'd like to know from you guys is which types you prefer, which ones you dislike, and why.
I like my manuals and electrics the same. While manuals differ more from each other in terms of touch, they are also more fun to use (albeit for a shorter time period) than manuals. Electrics are great for long stretches on my computer-adapted fingers, and as a bonus I can use them even when I get really tired because they don't take much effort to operate.
While I do like them both a lot, I am more picky about my electrics than my manuals. I prefer the big, heavy office electrics. My all time favorite electric is my IBM Model C, and my least favorite a junky plastic Royal Apollo 12 that I sold a while back.
Electronics... it depends on what features the machine has, or really how easy it is to use. Manufacturers tended to make their electronics way more complicated than need be, and sometimes these machine are just a pain to use with all their near useless specialized features. However, they do print nicely and are dirt cheap to obtain.
So, what is everyone else's thoughts? I'd love to hear from another electric user, we seem to be thin on the ground around here
Last edited by JustAnotherGuy (20-5-2015 20:05:53)
Offline
I only own one electric typewriter, a Smith Corona Coronet Super 12. I like it. It is the one that I used to practice on when I took a typing class in the mid 80's. It is easy to use.
There is a Royal Academy in mom & dad's basement. I haven't been able to find anything out about this machine. I have a pic on my cell phone. Eventually I might get some photos up on this forum.
We still haven't determined if they still have their old Royal QDL white. I hope they do, but we haven't found it yet.
Offline
Manuals blow electrics away... for me
Electrics and electronics just seem too... too much like computers. They have no elegance like the manuals. I mean, you even have to plug em in half the time. Manuals seem like a peice of art to me. Think of how they had to put 2000+ parts together in a factory. How much time it took for just ONE machine.
Last edited by TypewriterGuy (21-5-2015 17:23:45)
Offline
I once had a Smith-Corona daisy wheel electric, back in the 1980s. Very functional and reliable, but expensive to use because of the one-use film ribbons and correction cartridges.
My brother still has the family Hermes electric, from the very early 1970s. It uses a standard cloth typewriter ribbon, and is very nice to type upon, though a bit noisy, due to the hum of the motor and the clunk sound when shifting.
Overall, I do prefer manual typewriters, however, expecially portables.
~Joe
Offline
I would have to say manuals beat electric/electronics. Even though electricity is an wonderful thing and it has greatly benefited us, I have to say how a manual manages to pull off a complicated task all on its own without being plugged in, it's just almost magical. Sure I would like to get my hands on a nice early Royal electic standard, and the SC electric portables are pretty cool too, but manuals just have a certain charm that nothing can replicate. The electronics are just plain boring to me. They do their job, then just blend back into the background. It's like the computers that out school has (which are still running on Windows Vista ), they're just there. Cheap 80's/90's tech that was never meant to last. Which is also why I like the manuals more, they last lifetimes. So manuals are just better in my opinion.
Offline
Although I would have to agree that manuals beat electrics - especially from a repair point of view where there is much more scope for making your own parts from scratch - I think that the remaining office electrics (not electronic daisywheel typewriters) will become the next big thing. There are far fewer survivors because these were primarily business tools. This meant that they were used to death and then discarded. Unlike office manuals which were sometimes taken home by employees when no longer wanted, I cannot imagine anyone (who wasn't an enthusiast) wanting to take a great big electric typewriter home. I repaired an Adler 131d a few months back. It only survived because it had been linked to an early invoicing computer, which made the whole package expensive and worth keeping. I had forgotten how nice it was to type on. I am pretty sure that the last Adler Electric I worked on was in the early 1990's. That's how rare they are getting ! Perhaps there is one vintage electric typewriter surviving for every 1,000 1930's manual portables. Like I said - the next big thing in typewriter collecting !!!
Offline
ztyper wrote:
I would have to say manuals beat electric/electronics. Even though electricity is an wonderful thing and it has greatly benefited us, I have to say how a manual manages to pull off a complicated task all on its own without being plugged in, it's just almost magical. Sure I would like to get my hands on a nice early Royal electic standard, and the SC electric portables are pretty cool too, but manuals just have a certain charm that nothing can replicate. The electronics are just plain boring to me. They do their job, then just blend back into the background. It's like the computers that out school has (which are still running on Windows Vista ), they're just there. Cheap 80's/90's tech that was never meant to last. Which is also why I like the manuals more, they last lifetimes. So manuals are just better in my opinion.
Early Royal electric? Likethis one?
Like thetypewriterman said, the office electrics (like the Royal Electrics) are getting hard to find. Good luck finding one... I have two Royal Electrics, an Olympia SGE (electric SG3!) and an IBM Model C. They are so worth having, it's a shame they're disappearing. Electric typewriters, especially office electrics, were built with the same quality of the manuals from the same period and with the same complexity. Electronics, not so much...
Oh, and until last year my school still ran computers with WIndows XP. Near the end, they were getting viruses every other day, it was quite amusing.
Offline
Yes! That's the one! And you got it in the lovely green paint that I just love. I wish a few more of my typewriters were more colorful and less drab. I actually had the chance to get a 50's IBM electric at a thrift shop, but I passed it up for a Underwood Touch-Master 5. Wish I got it now that I know that they're disappearing...
Offline
To Z-Typer: a solution to the "drab typewriter": a can of gool ol' Krylon spray paint in the right places will do wonders. Oh yes, Rustoleum works good too! I once painted a 1959 Royal electric RE fire engine red. I've even painted a few IBM Executive models--including a model D I three-toned Black, White, and Blue. Oh, I wish I still had that one!! Oh yes, to the main subject: I guess all have their advantages and drawbacks--six of one, half a dozen of another, though I prefer the manuals and vintage electrics. Electronics have too much plastic in 'em.
Offline
^ Same. Although some of the Smith Corona electronics are fun to use.