Offline
Kasper wrote:
thetypewriterman wrote:
It's a Brother portable !
How can you tell?!
I'm sure that Typewriterman has seen the insides of more typewriters than anyone else here. The cross-brace, platen knobs, and keys are definitely similar to those used by Brother. I would have guessed a Rexina, or even a Halberg, for the same reasons, but it's far more likely that you would find a Brother at the bottom of a river.
Offline
From the shape of the keytops and the platen knobs, which are almost out of the picture. The other possibility would have been a Silver Reed/Imperial which are very similar to the Brother on casual inspection, but the platen knobs are the clincher ! I've been involved with typewriters since 1975, and get a bit O.C.D. about them !
Offline
Kudos sir, kudos...
Offline
That Fleetwood just cracks me up every time I look at it. There was one up on eBay UK recently and I showed it to my partner who said he loved its cool design, and seventies lines, and especially that 'veneer'. I still don't know if he was pulling my leg or not. My daughters agreed with me that it looked pretty hideous.
To me, it looks like the crummy record player we had when I was little, so I think of it as the Fleetwood Mac... But maybe in the flesh it's different.
Offline
I picked up a Fleetwood about a month ago and literally brought it back from the dead. It had been pulled from a barn and was in horrendous condition. After a lot of cleaning and a number of mechanical repairs I had to admit that it was growing on me. Ready for a test run, I was pleasantly surprised by its type action, but at the start of the third paragraph there was a loud 'sprong' and that was the end of it; the mainspring had snapped in half and now the machine is lying dormant again. It's worth owning one, and hopefull I'll be able to rig something up to revive this one, because once you've had a taste of the Fleetwood it just doesn't look as ugly anymore.
Offline
I saw one of these today in the thrift store:
Ugliest typewriter imaginable in my opinion. Like someone took a ca. 2003 cordless phone and made it ten times larger. The thing practically screams "I was made in China!"Offline
I've got several candidates for what I consider the ugliest: The Olivetti Valentine; Royal Princess; IBM Models 1 thru 10, A and B (especially when they're using carbon ribbon magazines); Very early Underwood electrics. This is not an objective point of view here, and they all could have very good pieces of equipment in their midst. Looks aren't everything.
Offline
TypewriterKing wrote:
I've got several candidates for what I consider the ugliest: The Olivetti Valentine; Royal Princess; IBM Models 1 thru 10, A and B (especially when they're using carbon ribbon magazines); Very early Underwood electrics. This is not an objective point of view here, and they all could have very good pieces of equipment in their midst. Looks aren't everything.
I am most upset about the early Underwood electrics since I want one especially for the looks! How could one not love the big curves on the front and the slants on the sides? Not to mention the chromes of the carriage? Seems to me all signs point to a very beautiful typewriter indeed.
Offline
Uwe wrote:
My apologies in advance to anyone who might be unfortunate enough to own one of these, but this has to a candidate for the Top Ten list of Ugliest Typers ever designed and built.
Simply stated, the Royal Fleetwood is painful to look at. If its tissue paper box design wasn't already bad enough, someone got the not-so-bright idea to degrade its aesthetics even further by covering it in a faux wood finish. It looks crude. It looks rude. And it should receive a world-wide ban from public appearances.
By an odd coincidence I came upon this post after comparing the Futura 800 to this very machine unfavorably in terms of touch. I bought one for almost nothing with the faux wood grain nearly worn off but pleasant to use - though I take an extra pleasure in using machines which don't look like they should be usable but still work fine. They are survivors.
So if I only wanted to stare at the thing for inspiration for Forbidden Planet Part II I would take the Futura, but if I actually planned to use it I'd take the Fleetwood in a heartbeat. It has the attack and release of a manual typewriter. I picked up a second one which included the transistor radio - only because I had read of this and the eBay photos showed that it was there though the seller apparently did not know about it.
Offline
TypewriterKing wrote:
I've got several candidates for what I consider the ugliest: The Olivetti Valentine; Royal Princess; IBM Models 1 thru 10, A and B (especially when they're using carbon ribbon magazines); Very early Underwood electrics. This is not an objective point of view here, and they all could have very good pieces of equipment in their midst. Looks aren't everything.
A good reminder about the subjectivity of aesthetics. I own a wide carriage IBM B in green crinkle and I love that machine as a gestalt, including its deep alien technology looks! I also love the fact that loving it it was almost given away, so thanks due to you and all others who not appreciating it kept the price low for me. ;) I love it more for the way it walks on the table when the double width carriage returns - but I am easily amused. Maybe the carriage brake needs adjusting.