You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



06-5-2016 06:52:13  #51


Re: Ugliest typewriter

Pretty sure these were designed just for the prisons; they're a response to a need, at a time when typewriters aren't really being manufactured commercially. It doesn't look that pleasant to use though, does it? It just looks like a computer keyboard on it. Hardly gonna have that Olympia snap...

 

06-5-2016 07:31:17  #52


Re: Ugliest typewriter

KatLondon wrote:

It doesn't look that pleasant to use though, does it?

I agree. Actually, I find it rather soulless. A lot of plastic and a circuit board, it's pretty far removed from a manual typewriter, even an electromechanical one for that matter. Still, if I was in prison I'd be overjoyed to have one; something tells me that a fountain pen would be considered to similar to a shiv, so a typewriter of any kind would be a godsend in such an environment. And speaking of environments, they knocked down the utilitarian prison in my area a few years ago, presumably because it was overflowing with human rats, and replaced it with one several times larger that has the facade of a grand hotel. The sight of that grandiose waste of taxpayer's money sickens me every time I drive by it, and it wouldn't surprise me if there's a Swintec in every cell.  


The pronoun has always been capitalized in the English language for more than 700 years.
 

29-5-2016 23:46:41  #53


Re: Ugliest typewriter

Stevetype33 wrote:

Amelia: Okay, right. I thought it might have been a typo, or some reference that had gone over my head.

I had no idea that these see-through models existed. That has got to be the most interesting thing I've heard this year.

Uwe: You're right about the wood-effect Royal - it's yuck squared. But if you look at these uggos long enough they do start to exert a hypnotic fascination...

I don't know about that.  I tried for awhile, now my head hurts and I need eye bleach.
 


Underwood--Speeds the World's Bidness
 

30-5-2016 05:22:55  #54


Re: Ugliest typewriter

TypewriterKing wrote:

Stevetype33 wrote:

Uwe: You're right about the wood-effect Royal - it's yuck squared. But if you look at these uggos long enough they do start to exert a hypnotic fascination...

I don't know about that. I tried for awhile, now my head hurts and I need eye bleach.

I liked the first Fleetwood I bought because I bought it cheap and it worked fine. Functionality gives any machine a veneer of beauty. I went on to buy a second one inexpensively with the genuine transistor radio - I had thought up to then that the claim that some had radios built in was a joke.  I have since seen the identical machine in different color schemes with different model names, but you have to stop somewhere.

Regarding "inmates" - that is an odd term for prisoner now that I think about it, and no doubt yet another link in a chain of failed euphemisms - like "asylum" for what we would now call a psychiatric hospital. It was a nice thought: the state is not imprisoning the guests with differing perceptions of reality, it is only providing "asylum". Only the strongest of words can survive such treatment: weaker words accumulate the full weight of whatever you were cleverly trying to euphemize until they too are discarded. Try using "retarded" today for anything except spark plug timing!
 


"Damn the torpedoes! Four bells, Captain Drayton".
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum