Offline
Whats the worst one you have used in terms of type action?
Mine was a Smith Corona Skywriter. Ugghhh. Horrible horrible type action.
So whats yours?
Offline
My least favorite in my collection is the Hermes Rocket. No sir, I don't like it! It's cute though.
Offline
Once tried an Olivetti Valentine, which was rubbish - though I guess in making any of these judgements you have to be certain that the machine is in A1 condition; perhaps this one was not.
Offline
A Singer and a Facit rank as my two top worst typewriter encounters. Both were clean and appeared to be in good working condition (i.e. all functions operated) but I was turned off both these makes as a result. Beak has a good point, though, about condition.The machines I encountered may not have been good examples of either make.
Ps: I was sorely tempted to buy the Singer regardless, as it came with the most beautiful case I think I have ever seen!
Last edited by Valiant (11-9-2015 10:31:53)
Offline
The worst I have ever used, was the Corona Zephyr DeLuxe. The action was pretty... lame. Too light, too cheap, too flimsy and stiff in all of the wrong places. (Though I guess every ultra-portable is "lame" compared to the Olympia SF)
Good thing I finally sold that thing today.
Offline
I have a couple of Splendids. They're not the *lightest* ultra-portables, are they...
Offline
My skywriter is in great condition... I think all those 50s-60s models were built cheaply then. Except for the sterling. Thats one of my favorite for type action.
Offline
The worst typewriter I have ever used was the one that got me hooked on typewriters, so it couldn't have been too bad. It is a Brother 750 deluxe. I have read somewhere that they were mass produced and dumped on the Asian market.
I was planning on giving it to my daughter to play with. I told her that she could have this typewriter as her own. But she told me she wanted my Olympia SM3. Maybe in a few more years.
Offline
TypewriterGuy wrote:
My skywriter is in great condition... I think all those 50s-60s models were built cheaply then. Except for the sterling. Thats one of my favorite for type action.
That's not even close to being an accurate statement. First off, you can't clump '50s and '60s machines together; in terms of typewriter history they're two completely different eras. All Smith-Corona models from the '50s were well built and exceptional machines in terms of typing performance. The Smith-Corona ultra-portables that were manufactured in the late '60s to counter the flood of inexpensive Brother typewriters were junk. Conversely, the regular-sized (6-series) portables were still very good typewriters.
As Beak and Valiant pointed out, until you've used many examples of the same model you shouldn't be making sweeping comments about their performance. We are talking about used machines after all, some have survived the years in better condition than others, and as a result are more indicative of their performance when they were new. Furthermore, when describing a worst-ever model it should be qualified by ranking it within its own sub-genre: No ultra-portable will ever stack up well against a standard in terms of type action.
With respect to the Skyriter, I would never describe it as a worst-ever model and I suspect that there's something wrong with your machine for you to have made such an association.
Offline
NDW76 wrote:
Brother 750 deluxe. I have read somewhere that they were mass produced and dumped on the Asian market.
I've never read anything about Brother's influence on the Asian market, but it was Brother's aggressive approach ("dumping") in the North American market that not only lead to lawsuits, but forced companies such as Smith-Corona to fight back with their own budget-friendly machines.