Offline
Completely right about that carrying technique, Uwe. It really works.
In addition, I have seen antique dealers grab and lift large desktop machines by their carriages. If they do that right in front of a buyer, how do they treat them when they're cleaning out a house?
Offline
Re: carrying technique, if you are carrying a typewriter in your car, the best place to put it is in the passenger footwell. If you have to brake suddenly, the machine is already in the lowest part of the car and will not go anywhere. We used to do this with customers machines in the trade whenever possible. One of the worst ways of handling a typewriter that I have seen recently was when I went to collect an Imperial 50 that I had bought on e-bay. When I got to the chap's house, he picked it up using the thinnest part of the top plate (just above the segment) as a handle ! When I told him to stop, he told me that it was OK because it was cast iron ! That's the same cast iron that is brittle under shock and bending loads of course. Miraculously, it didn't break. Some people !!!!
Offline
M. Höhne wrote:
I have seen antique dealers grab and lift large desktop machines by their carriages.
Ouch!
thetypewriterman wrote:
he picked it up using the thinnest part of the top plate (just above the segment) as a handle!
Double ouch!
It's sometimes best that we don't see how a machine is being handled by those who don't know anything about them. I keep explaining to people, especially those who are about to ship me a typewriter, that their solid metal mass belies the fact that they are extremely fragile when subjected to things that aren't associated with the act of typing. It's also a little funny; on one hand you have people like me who cradle these machines like new borns against their chest while others toss them about like the proverbial baby being thrown out with the bath water.
Offline
Okay, curiosity got the better of me, and, feeling strong today, I decided to weigh my heftiest typers just to see what they run.
1936 Royal KHM...... 34 lbs
1937 Remington Noiseless Standard model 10.... 37 lbs
1940 Underwood Noiseless Standard.... 40 lbs
1955 IBM model B (standard).... 42 lbs
Offline
Someone should weigh the SG3 carriage and the machine without the carriage on. I'm sure the carriage weighs more than the machine.
Offline
Given there were around five carriage sizes available, it would of course depend, but with a standard size carriage the breakdown is: 23.4 lbs (machine) + 12.0 lbs (carriage) = 35.4 lbs (total)
Offline
Ahh... I THINK mine's a standard carriage, it's roughly the same sort of length as the machine is wide - what can I say, it feels as if it weighs more than that! It must be because it's solid, compact weight.
Offline
What year was your SG3 manufactured, Kat? The model went through a number of changes during its production history, and with each iteration there were fewer optional carriage sizes available. With early models there were six different carriages available, the later German-made version only offered five, and by the time they were made in Mexico you could only pick from four.
Here are the net weights for the Mexican SG3 models, and as you can see they really put them on a diet because these are much lighter than the German models:
33 cm/13 in. carriage model = 14.2 kg (31.3 lbs)
38 cm/15 in. carriage model = 15.0 kg (33.0 lbs)
46 cm/18 in. carriage model = 16.0 kg (35.3 lbs)
62 cm/24 in. carriage model = 18.7 kg (41.2 lbs)
Offline
Oh it's a really late one - 1978. I'm reasonably sure it's just a 13in carriage, but I'm sick in bed with some sort of swine flu or something so not going to get up and measure it right now... Didn't know they were made in Mexico!