Offline
On another thread, it was opined that the Underwood Model 5 (not to be confused with the Underwood Touch-Master 5) is the crown jewel among typewriter collectors because it's open, the old black paint and gold decals gives it a certain charm, and it gives the look of the true author's typewriter. Therefore, you find a lot of these going for as much as $250 or more, and a lot of these are most certainly not in working condition, let alone good working condition. Then, among a lot of our members, the Olympias are very popular because they are a finely-tuned, high-performance typer that could only be brought to us by that good ol' German over-engineering. I know and definitely appreciate both machines, as I have owned many versions of each. But, I've got to tell you--Underwood Model 5 machines are definitely primitive and very clunky compared to the velvety smoothness of an Olympia SG-series machine.
But who is to say which typewriters are the collectible ones? Which ones are the most hotly sought after? Which typewriters, besides the Olympia (which is a VERY good machine--the Mercedes Benz of typewriterdom), have the collectibility factor?
I think a case could be made for the following:
The "Easter-Egg" Royal QDLs--good typewriters, though not as solid in feel compared to an Olympia SM-series, but a fairly rugged and reliable machine nonetheless. The remark was once made that their escapement mechanisms weren't up to par, but upon my examinations with scores of these machines, I have found no trouble or signs of any major wear.
The legendary Royal HH--very good typers--solid, rugged, reliable, will outlast you and your grandkids. These machines are tanks, but most of them are colored in that drab brown with green keys. Not too bad if you like earthtones, but it can get monotnous. Some of the later ones were painted in the "Easter-Egg" style, but I have only seen one silver-colored one. Some people have even said that although they are a solid machine, they lack features such as an extended back paper rest, and half-vertical-spacing. It is typical among American-made typewriters--especially the early ones.
Underwoods made between mid-1946 to 1963--These include the Basket-Shifting Underwood Rhythm Shift all the way to the Touch-Master Fives. I have never been able to figure out why it is that whenever I get one from this group, it almost always needs at least three or more adjustments (especially the shift alignment), a good cleaning and a good oiling. Whenever I give it those three things, they last forever. I can't figure out where they went wrong with their previous owners. But once rolling, these typewriters are among Underwood's best.
Electric typewriters foreign and domestic--I include the earliest from the 1901 Blickensderfers (if you can find one) to the 1925 Remington electrics, the 1932 electric return only Burroughs, and the 1933 Electromatics to the late 1940s on up electrics. Alot of purists who collect only manual typewriters will not touch an electric typewriter--mainly because they do not understand how they work, and believe them not to be true typewriters. This isn't saying all collectors believe this, as I sure don't. In fact, I believe the electric typewriters are a viable part of typewriting history--including even the electronic jobs up to the pre-computer word processors.
So I end with a question: What other machines can be included in the highly desirable list of typewriters a collector has Just Gotta Have? I offered here a partial list, but, as a collector, I tend to go for most any brand--especially those machines that are specially equipped or have a very interesting typeface, or any ol' thing I haven't seen before.
Offline
What on earth is an "Easter egg" Royal Quiet De Luxe?
To my knowledge Royal never manufactured a typewriter that looked like this:
Offline
I'm talking about the color options of the mid-to-late Royal Quiet De Luxe, such as red, blue, green, silver-gray--as opposed to the original wrinkle-finish brown and gray they bore when that particular shell came out in the early fifties. The one I once had was a turquoise blue from 1958. Those are the machines to which I referred. If I am wrong about the paint color options, and that some of these typewriters were painted aftermarket like this, please tell me. But again, this generation of Royal portables was the one to which I was referring.
Offline
"Easter-Egg" was strictly a name I gave these typewriters because of the colors I have seen them having been painted--either factory paint jobs or aftermarket. Again, if I were erroneous in believing this particular generation of Royal portables were painted like this from the factory, I do ask everyone's pardon, because I do not want to pass any misinformation.
Offline
Uwe wrote:
What on earth is an "Easter egg" Royal Quiet De Luxe?
To my knowledge Royal never manufactured a typewriter that looked like this:
To my knowledge, Easter Eggs, at least the ones I remember from childhood, also came in solid colors.
Offline
TypewriterKing wrote:
So I end with a question: What other machines can be included in the highly desirable list of typewriters a collector has Just Gotta Have?
Boy, there's a long list of machines that I would love to have. In a perfect world, I would have at least one of everything. But since that is next to impossible, I think it's gotta be the one I've been pining for since the very beginning: the Olympia SG-1. I've been looking for this one for over two years now, ever since I started collecting really. Funny thing is, in my search for the "Holy Grail" of typewriters, I've found nearly every typewriter in between. I'm nearly giving up my search for the SG-1 because I have so many typewriters that I would not mind using as my main machine. Like my Underwood SX-100. As of this moment, it is my favorite. It's got a wide carriage, easy carriage return, wonderful touch, and that classic typewriter look.
Anyways, I digress, the SG-1 is #1 of my wish list
(Along with an Erika M. But I think that is aiming a bit too high...)
Offline
TypewriterKing wrote:
If I am wrong about the paint color options, and that some of these typewriters were painted aftermarket like this, please tell me.
Royal had offered colour options for a large number of different models starting with its first portable, the 1920s Model P. The Quiet De Luxe variant that you're referring to was produced during the second half of the 1950s, but the available colours varied from year to year and included blue, grey, green, yellow, red, beige, white and pink.
Offline
Yeah, like the solid colored Easter eggs. But I will say, it sure would have been interesting if they were colored like the eggs on the link you gave me. You know, it might be something to try to paint one of my more rounded typewriters, like a Royal MC or an IBM model A or be, or even an Everest from the fifties like that!
Offline
After the recent acqusition of a 1940 Danish keyboard Erika S in mint condition, I have to say that I think Erika belongs up there with Olympia ....(Well, almost!)
Although built with an entirely different approach, they are beautifully constructed, inside and out, with a high level of finish even on parts like screws, just like a wristwatch. The type slugs give the sharpest outline I have seen compared to any machine I know/have (Remington, Olympia, Underwood, Royal).
I only think one must like the touch of it as it s quite different from everything else.
Lightly sprung keys, very direct connection to the paper, in an elegant way. You really feel this connection from the keytop all the way to the impact - unlke the touch we all know from a Royal, Remington or Olympia for instance. However light it feels, it is tough and can be used for hours without any problem. As a trained keyboard player, I parrticularly like this aspect, but perhaps some may find it too 'direct', if that is a good word.
I can honestly say that I almost got a tear of nostalgia in my eye when I looked at all the details of this machine closely, because of the obvious pride in workmanship, construction, choice of materials and design it embodied as an industrially produced product, with care and attention to details to create a great and long lasting product - which most companies today could care less about.
Offline
TypewriterKing wrote:
The legendary Royal HH--very good typers--solid, rugged, reliable, will outlast you and your grandkids. These machines are tanks, but most of them are colored in that drab brown with green keys....
I have had bad luck with the Royal HH and FP - I may have five total now, but only one reached me in working condition however they started out. One FP is a real typewriter tragedy, but I may tell that story another day. Not saying they are not rugged machines, just that personally I've had bad luck.
As for collectability, unless you are aiming to flip them and care about what the market thinks that would seem to be purely subjective, and when I love a machine that nobody seems much interested in at the moment so much the better. I like a shiny mechanical work of art as much as the next person but I also love the tramp typewriters of the world that were just unobtrusively doing a job of work for many years in some back office, battered but still banging away. Ironically battered looking typewriters sometimes are in better mechanical condition than the barely used ones, depending on how the latter have been stored. At least if a typewriter had to work for a living it had to have some maintenance to keep it working.